Arlo vs Nest Security Cameras: Which Is Better in 2026?

By Alex Stathopoulos ·

Affiliate Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support our testing and editorial work. Learn more.

Quick Comparison

Feature
Arlo Pro 5 by Arlo
Google Nest Cam (Battery) by Google
Price $249.99 $179.99
Rating 4.4 /5 4.3 /5
resolution 2K HDR 1080p HDR
field Of View 160° diagonal 130° diagonal
night Vision Color Night Vision with spotlight Night vision with HDR
audio Two-way audio with siren Two-way audio
storage Arlo Secure subscription + local USB 3 hours free cloud + Nest Aware
connectivity Wi-Fi 6 Wi-Fi + Bluetooth
power Rechargeable battery or solar Rechargeable battery or wired
compatibility Alexa, Google, HomeKit Google Home
Check Price Check Price

The Arlo Pro 5 and Google Nest Cam (Battery) are both premium wireless security cameras targeting homeowners who want high-quality video without running cables. They sit at very different price points, and the hardware gap between them is substantial. After thorough testing of both cameras in indoor and outdoor environments, we are confident the Arlo Pro 5 is the better camera for anyone willing to invest in top-tier home security. Its 2K resolution, 160-degree field of view, universal smart home compatibility, and built-in siren outclass the Nest Cam in nearly every measurable category. The Nest Cam is a solid camera, but it struggles to justify its $179.99 price when the hardware feels a generation behind.

The Quick Verdict

Buy the Arlo Pro 5 if you want the best wireless security camera hardware available, need compatibility with all three major smart home platforms, or want features like a built-in siren and six-month battery life. Buy the Google Nest Cam (Battery) if you are committed to Google Home and want a simpler, more affordable wireless camera with excellent on-device AI. For raw capability, the Arlo Pro 5 wins decisively.

Video Quality

This is the most important comparison point, and it is not close. The Arlo Pro 5 records in 2K HDR with a 160-degree diagonal field of view. The Google Nest Cam (Battery) records in 1080p HDR with a 130-degree diagonal field of view. The Arlo delivers roughly twice the pixel count and 30 degrees more coverage.

In practice, the Arlo Pro 5’s 2K resolution means you can zoom into footage and still identify faces, license plates, and small details that become blurry mush on the Nest Cam. The wider field of view covers more of your yard, driveway, or room with a single camera, potentially reducing the number of cameras you need.

Both cameras support HDR, which helps balance bright skies with shaded porches and entryways. The Arlo’s HDR processing is more aggressive and effective, likely benefiting from the higher resolution source material.

At $179.99, the Nest Cam’s 1080p resolution feels dated. In 2026, 1080p is the minimum expectation even from budget cameras under $40. Paying nearly $180 for it is a tough proposition when the Arlo delivers 2K for $70 more.

Winner: Arlo Pro 5 — 2K HDR and a 160-degree field of view are a clear generation ahead.

Night Vision

The Arlo Pro 5 features Color Night Vision with a built-in spotlight. The spotlight activates when motion is detected, illuminating the area in front of the camera and capturing full-color footage. You can also trigger the spotlight manually as a deterrent. When the spotlight is off, the camera still captures color footage in low-light conditions thanks to its advanced sensor.

The Google Nest Cam (Battery) offers Night Vision with HDR, which handles darkness competently but relies more heavily on infrared in very dark environments. The HDR processing helps preserve some detail in shadows, but the footage lacks the color richness of the Arlo’s spotlight-enhanced recordings.

For security purposes, the difference matters. Color footage lets you identify clothing, vehicle colors, and other details that black-and-white or washed-out footage cannot. The Arlo’s combined approach of color sensor plus spotlight delivers the most usable nighttime footage of any wireless camera in this price range.

Winner: Arlo Pro 5 — spotlight plus color night vision produces significantly better nighttime footage.

Battery Life and Power Options

Both cameras are battery-powered and wire-free. The Arlo Pro 5 claims up to six months of battery life, which is among the longest in the industry for a camera of this caliber. Real-world results depend on activity levels, but four to five months is typical with moderate traffic.

The Google Nest Cam (Battery) does not specify an exact battery life in the same way, but users generally report two to three months between charges with moderate use. Cold weather significantly reduces battery performance on the Nest Cam, which is a serious concern for outdoor installations in northern climates.

The Arlo Pro 5 supports solar panel charging, which effectively eliminates battery anxiety altogether. Connect an Arlo Solar Panel and the camera maintains its charge indefinitely in most conditions. The Nest Cam can be wired for continuous power but does not support solar charging natively.

Both cameras use magnetic mounts for easy positioning, but the Arlo’s longer battery life and solar option make it the more practical wire-free solution.

Winner: Arlo Pro 5 — longer battery life plus solar charging support.

Smart Home Compatibility

This is one of the Arlo Pro 5’s standout advantages. It works with Alexa, Google Home, and Apple HomeKit, covering all three major platforms. No matter what ecosystem you are in today or might switch to tomorrow, the Arlo Pro 5 fits.

The Google Nest Cam (Battery) works exclusively with Google Home. It does not support Alexa or HomeKit. If anyone in your household uses a different assistant, or if you ever decide to switch platforms, the Nest Cam becomes an ecosystem orphan.

Apple HomeKit support is particularly notable for the Arlo. HomeKit Secure Video allows you to store encrypted footage in iCloud, use Apple’s Home app for viewing, and integrate with other HomeKit accessories. For Apple households, the Arlo Pro 5 is one of the only premium wireless cameras that works natively with their ecosystem.

Universal platform support also makes the Arlo Pro 5 a safer long-term investment. Smart home ecosystems are still evolving, and locking into a single platform is a risk.

Winner: Arlo Pro 5 — all three platforms versus Google only is a decisive advantage.

Security Features

The Arlo Pro 5 includes a built-in siren that can be triggered manually through the app or automatically when specific types of motion are detected. The siren is loud enough to startle intruders and alert neighbors. Combined with the spotlight, the Arlo Pro 5 acts as both a detective and a deterrent.

The Google Nest Cam (Battery) does not include a siren. Its deterrence capability is limited to two-way audio, where you can speak through the camera to address whoever is in view.

The Nest Cam does feature excellent on-device AI that processes events locally before sending them to the cloud. It distinguishes between people, animals, and vehicles, and the processing happens on the camera itself, which is better for privacy. The Arlo Pro 5 also offers AI detection but processes more of it through the cloud via the Arlo Secure subscription.

Both cameras support two-way audio, but the Arlo’s inclusion of a siren adds a physical security feature that the Nest Cam simply cannot match.

Winner: Arlo Pro 5 — the built-in siren and spotlight provide active deterrence the Nest Cam lacks.

Storage and Subscription Costs

Both cameras lean heavily on subscriptions, which is the biggest weakness in this price range. The Arlo Secure subscription starts at $7.99/month for a single camera or $17.99/month for unlimited cameras. The Google Nest Aware subscription starts at $8/month for event recording or $15/month for 24/7 continuous recording.

The Nest Cam offers three hours of free cloud event history, which provides basic functionality without a subscription. The Arlo Pro 5 does not include any free cloud storage, but it does support local USB storage when used with an Arlo SmartHub (sold separately), giving it a path to subscription-free recording that the Nest Cam lacks.

Both subscription models are expensive compared to budget camera alternatives, but at this premium price point, most buyers have already accepted the recurring cost model.

Winner: Google Nest Cam — three hours of free cloud storage is better than no free storage at all.

Who Should Buy the Arlo Pro 5

  • You want the best video quality available in a wireless camera with 2K HDR resolution
  • Your home uses multiple smart home platforms or you use Apple HomeKit
  • You need a camera with a built-in siren and spotlight for active deterrence
  • Long battery life and solar charging support matter for your installation
  • You want the widest field of view to minimize the number of cameras needed
  • You are building a comprehensive outdoor security system and want top-tier hardware

Who Should Buy the Google Nest Cam (Battery)

  • Your home runs exclusively on Google Home and Nest Hub displays
  • You want a simpler, more affordable wireless camera under $200
  • On-device AI processing and privacy-first detection are important to you
  • You prefer three hours of free cloud storage without committing to a subscription immediately
  • You need a compact, magnetically-mounted camera for indoor use
  • You value the ease of Google’s ecosystem over raw hardware specifications

Final Verdict

The Arlo Pro 5 is the better security camera in 2026 by a significant margin. It outperforms the Google Nest Cam (Battery) in resolution, field of view, night vision, battery life, smart home compatibility, and security features. The $70 premium over the Nest Cam buys you genuinely superior hardware across every major specification.

The Google Nest Cam (Battery) is a competent camera with excellent on-device AI and a clean integration into the Google Home ecosystem. If you are a Google-only household on a tighter budget, it serves its purpose well. But at $179.99 for 1080p video in 2026, it is hard not to feel like you are overpaying for the Google name when the Arlo Pro 5 delivers so much more for $249.99.

If you are investing in premium home security, the Arlo Pro 5 is the camera to buy.

Overall Winner: Arlo Pro 5

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arlo Pro 5 worth the extra money over the Nest Cam?

Yes, for most buyers. The $70 price difference buys you 2K HDR resolution instead of 1080p, a 160-degree field of view instead of 130 degrees, a built-in siren, longer battery life, solar charging support, and compatibility with Alexa, Google, and HomeKit. These are substantial upgrades, not incremental ones.

Does the Google Nest Cam Battery work with Alexa?

No. The Google Nest Cam (Battery) only works with Google Home. It does not support Amazon Alexa or Apple HomeKit. If your smart home relies on Alexa, consider the Arlo Pro 5 or a Ring camera instead.

How long does the Arlo Pro 5 battery last?

Arlo rates the Pro 5 battery at up to six months, though real-world usage typically yields four to five months depending on activity frequency and motion detection sensitivity. Adding an Arlo Solar Panel effectively eliminates battery concerns by keeping the camera charged continuously.

Can the Nest Cam Battery be used outdoors?

Yes, the Google Nest Cam (Battery) is weather-resistant and can be used outdoors. However, battery performance drops significantly in cold temperatures, which can be a problem in winter climates. The Arlo Pro 5 handles cold weather better and offers solar charging to compensate for any battery drain.

Do Arlo and Nest cameras require a subscription?

Both cameras are designed with subscriptions in mind. The Nest Cam offers three hours of free cloud event history, while the Arlo Pro 5 offers no free cloud storage but supports local USB recording with an Arlo SmartHub. For full functionality including extended video history and AI-powered alerts, both cameras effectively require their respective subscription plans.

Related Articles

AS

Alex Stathopoulos

Smart Home Editor

Alex has been testing and reviewing smart home devices for over 5 years. He's personally installed 50+ security cameras, tested every major smart speaker, and automated his entire home. When he's not geeking out over the latest Matter-compatible gadget, he's probably adjusting his smart thermostat schedule for the tenth time this week.